Discussion:
Removing SVR4_PKGNAME?
Thomas Klausner
2014-10-02 09:34:43 UTC
Permalink
Hi!

In the past, SVR4_PKGNAME was a short name of five characters max,
used on old Solaris versions so that packages compatible with their
packaging tools could be created.

I haven't seen anyone talking about or adding these alternate names to
packages for a very long time, so I wonder if it's time to remove
them.

Comments welcome!
Thomas
Aleksej Saushev
2014-10-02 19:04:45 UTC
Permalink
Hello,
Post by Thomas Klausner
In the past, SVR4_PKGNAME was a short name of five characters max,
used on old Solaris versions so that packages compatible with their
packaging tools could be created.
I haven't seen anyone talking about or adding these alternate names to
packages for a very long time, so I wonder if it's time to remove
them.
Yes, please.
--
HE CE3OH...
David Holland
2014-10-03 16:36:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by Thomas Klausner
In the past, SVR4_PKGNAME was a short name of five characters max,
used on old Solaris versions so that packages compatible with their
packaging tools could be created.
I haven't seen anyone talking about or adding these alternate names to
packages for a very long time, so I wonder if it's time to remove
them.
Yes, please...
--
David A. Holland
***@netbsd.org
Thomas Klausner
2014-10-09 13:56:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by Thomas Klausner
In the past, SVR4_PKGNAME was a short name of five characters max,
used on old Solaris versions so that packages compatible with their
packaging tools could be created.
I haven't seen anyone talking about or adding these alternate names to
packages for a very long time, so I wonder if it's time to remove
them.
Since there was no disagreement on this point, I've now removed this
variable from pkgsrc.

Related: Is pkgtools/gensolpkg still useful nowadays?
Thomas
Jonathan Perkin
2014-10-09 14:24:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by Thomas Klausner
Post by Thomas Klausner
In the past, SVR4_PKGNAME was a short name of five characters max,
used on old Solaris versions so that packages compatible with their
packaging tools could be created.
I haven't seen anyone talking about or adding these alternate names to
packages for a very long time, so I wonder if it's time to remove
them.
Since there was no disagreement on this point, I've now removed this
variable from pkgsrc.
Related: Is pkgtools/gensolpkg still useful nowadays?
agc@ should have the final say, but I presume not, and if there is any
interest in SVR4 packages from pkgsrc then I'd rather see a pkgformat
backend developed.
--
Jonathan Perkin - Joyent, Inc. - www.joyent.com
Loading...