Makoto Fujiwara
2014-06-17 12:22:06 UTC
Hi, David, sorry for your time.
| To: ***@netbsd.org
| CC: pkgsrc-***@netbsd.org
| From: David Sainty <***@dtsp.co.nz>
| Subject: Re: CVS commit: pkgsrc/cross/avr-binutils
| Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 23:33:13 +1200
I had known libiberty was necessary for simulavr, but I did not, at the
time of commit. Probably the reason of upstream removing libiberty was
the duplication with gcc side.
Now let me think about either
(1) revert avr-binutils to 2.23.2
or
(2) pursue the way for gcc (or others) to place libiberty.
Thanks a lot
---
Makoto Fujiwara,
Chiba, Japan, Narita Airport and Disneyland prefecture.
| To: ***@netbsd.org
| CC: pkgsrc-***@netbsd.org
| From: David Sainty <***@dtsp.co.nz>
| Subject: Re: CVS commit: pkgsrc/cross/avr-binutils
| Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 23:33:13 +1200
pkgsrc/cross/avr-binutils: Makefile PLIST distinfo
(pkgsrc)
Remove libiberty work around
(upstream)
Bump Version 2.23.2 to 2.24
---------------------------
(cross_only): Remove target-libiberty.
David> I think this has broken emulators/simulavr:(pkgsrc)
Remove libiberty work around
(upstream)
Bump Version 2.23.2 to 2.24
---------------------------
(cross_only): Remove target-libiberty.
I had known libiberty was necessary for simulavr, but I did not, at the
time of commit. Probably the reason of upstream removing libiberty was
the duplication with gcc side.
Now let me think about either
(1) revert avr-binutils to 2.23.2
or
(2) pursue the way for gcc (or others) to place libiberty.
Thanks a lot
---
Makoto Fujiwara,
Chiba, Japan, Narita Airport and Disneyland prefecture.